Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] References to polymorphic variants
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2004-02-25 (22:56)
From: Remi Vanicat <remi.vanicat@l...>
Subject: [Caml-list] Re: Caml-list References to polymorphic variants writes:

> Hi,
> I want to be able to store an arbitrary polymorphic variant in a
> reference:
> let (x : ([> ] option) ref ) = ref None ;;
> (Not my actual code, I've boiled it down to a minimal example.)
> This won't compile because it "contains a type variable which cannot
> be generalized".  I understand this error message in other contexts.
> If my code were
> let x = ref None
> then I could break type safety by putting (Some 1) into the reference,
> and later reading the reference with type (string option) thus casting
> a string to an int.
> But as I'm dealing with a polymorphic variant, surely this should not
> apply. My understanding of polymorphic variants is that you do not
> need to specify at the time of declaration what types it might
> contain.

you can break type safety with your example :

`Foo 10
`Foo "string"
are both some polymorphic variant, and if your generalized type would
be ok, nothing could forbid you to "convert" one to another, having
the same effect that the (Some 1) and (string option) example.

Rémi Vanicat

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: