On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 11:23:09AM -0800, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> > > Has anyone thought of implementing start conditions for ocamllex?
> 
> > Can't you get the same effect with multiple entrypoints? Though this syntax
> > is probably cleaner.
> > 
> 
> I disagree; I think different entry points are cleaner.  In some recent release
> they added the ability to pass your own parameter to the rules, and so I
> maintain state by passing a reference to the state.

I wasn't aware you could do that. Makes it a lot nicer than what I was
thinking of, yup.

-- 
Shawn Wagner
shawnw@speakeasy.org

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners