Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] void/unit in C calls
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Shawn Wagner <shawnw@s...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] void/unit in C calls
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 02:26:05PM -0500, Michael Furr wrote:
> 
> I realize this is somewhat of a pedantic question but, what is the proper
> prototype for a C function which has a parameter of type unit?
> ie:
>  external foo : unit -> unit = "foo_c"
> 
> should foo_c be declared
>  void foo_c(void);
> or
>  value foo_c(value);

This one.

> 
> Would it ever cause a problem on any architecture if one used the wrong
> form?

Yup. I've had problems with the bytecode runtime not liking C functions that
don't return anything when they should be returning a Val_unit.

-- 
Shawn Wagner
shawnw@speakeasy.org

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners