Browse thread
[Caml-list] How useful do you find the OCaml debugger?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-02-04 (19:13) |
From: | Issac Trotts <ijtrotts@u...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] How useful do you find the OCaml debugger? |
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 11:31:33PM -0500, donna+spam@cs.cmu.edu wrote: > Hello, > > My advisor and I were having a dicussion about the utility of debuggers for > functional langugages. He was of the opinion that they are not very useful > at all (for a functional language), and wondered if anyone even uses, for > instance, the OCaml debugger. Based on google-ing I have done, it looks like > it *is* used, but it's hard to get a good impression from just a web crawl. > So: > > - Do you personally find the OCaml debugger useful? Yes, definitely. The ability to run programs in reverse is especially useful. Using it, I removed a bunch of bugs from my Delaunay triangulator yesterday. It would have been much harder to find the problems some other way. That said, the debugger would be even better if it had conditional breakpoints, the ability to change variable values, and the ability to call functions. -- Issac Trotts http://redwood.ucdavis.edu/~issac ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners