Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Is Caml good for embedded systems?
- Leszek.Holenderski@p...
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-02-06 (09:26) |
From: | Leszek.Holenderski@p... |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Is Caml good for embedded systems? |
Kenneth Oksanen wrote: > > >I wonder if anybody attempted to use Caml (or any of its variants) to > >program embedded systems? > > It seems your question didn't quite get the discussion it deserved, > especially if you mean relatively small embedded systems (say, a > hundred kilobtres of RAM). I was just probing into the subject and I didn't expect much. This rather confirms my early suspicion that Caml is not good for programming embedded systems. > A few years ago a friend of mine, Lars Wirzenius, working on > such systems did a search trying to find existing systems, but came > out empty handed. So we wrote a concise LISP system, Hedgehog, for > his task. Here's the blurb about it: > ... > Lars' employer has the Hedgehog tutorial on-line: > http://www.oliotalo.fi/hedgehog/hoglisp.html > Lars' weblog also gives some information: > http://liw.iki.fi/liw/log/2003-Hedgehog-Lisp.html Thanks for the info. I'd prefer something natively compiled though. Leszek ----------------------------------------------------- Leszek Holenderski, Philips Research, The Netherlands ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners