Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Suggestion (was: Demande clarification nomenclature ocaml*)
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2004-03-19 (10:24)
From: Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons <Diego.FERNANDEZ_PONS@e...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Suggestion (was: Demande clarification nomenclature ocaml*)

> While waiting for nested namespaces one could do namespace-by-convention. One
> would keep INRIA (or possibly something convenient and shorter) as prefix for
> INRIA OCaml stuff, leaving other useful prefixes for the normal people. This
> namespace could then be maintained in a perlish style. Reading this list from
> time to time it is quite clear that there is a number of people who mail a
> lot to this list, who know a lot about OCaml (as far as I can judge this as
> someone who knows little about OCaml), and who would be suitable for being
> maintainers of the toplevel namespace.

Je ne comprends pas votre point : je ne parle pas d'espace de noms a
l'interieur d'un langage de programmation mais de noms exterieurement
visibles. Chez nos collegues de Haskell, leurs bibliotheques
s'appellent DData, Edison, Pancito, etc. et non HaskellDataLib,
HaskellDataLib et HaskellImages.

        Diego Olivier

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: