Browse thread
[Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library
-
Vasili Galchin
-
james woodyatt
- Sven Luther
-
Richard Jones
-
Shawn Wagner
-
Eric Stokes
-
Vasili Galchin
-
Eric Stokes
-
Vasili Galchin
-
Matt Gushee
-
Richard Jones
-
Nicolas Cannasse
- Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
- Wolfgang Müller
-
John Carr
-
Richard Jones
-
oliver@f...
-
John Carr
-
Richard Jones
- Jacques Garrigue
- Benjamin Geer
- Michael Vanier
- Sven Luther
-
Richard Jones
- Sven Luther
-
John Carr
-
oliver@f...
-
Richard Jones
-
Nicolas Cannasse
- Shawn Wagner
- Vasili Galchin
- Vasili Galchin
-
Richard Jones
-
Matt Gushee
-
Vasili Galchin
-
Eric Stokes
-
Vasili Galchin
-
Eric Stokes
-
Shawn Wagner
- Stefano Zacchiroli
-
james woodyatt
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Sven Luther <sven.luther@w...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library |
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:59:20AM -0800, james woodyatt wrote: > On 09 Mar 2004, at 09:30, Vasili Galchin wrote: > > > > I have yet to finish reading through otherlibs/unix/unix.mli. I > >kind of consider this POSIX API support. In any case, is there is a > >consensus that what is in unix.mli is complete? Or does new > >functionality have to be added? If so, what? > > I think the Unix module could be regarded as incomplete. > > The tactic I have taken with this problem is to regard the Unix library > in the Ocaml distribution as the property of INRIA. It has what it > has, and it will get what INRIA decides is missing when the INRIA team > decides to put it there. > > I found the support for socket options to be lacking. I wanted IPv6 I also have a bug report open against the debian ocaml package asking quite intently for IPv6 supoprt, also claiming ocaml to be 'useless' to him until it would support IPv6. Is there any IPv6 support planed in the near future ? I know this discussion did already happen, but i guess nothing came of it back then. Friendly, Sven Luther ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners