Browse thread
[Caml-list] extensible records again
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Michael Vanier <mvanier@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] extensible records again |
> From: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net> > Date: 22 Mar 2004 14:31:16 +1100 > > On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 09:34, Michael Vanier wrote: > > > If I understand you correctly, then you're arguing that *all* my "core > > types" should be implemented using polymorphic variants. > > I use Polymorphic Variants almost exclusively in Felix. > They're more flexible but also give nastier error messages. > > The main downside is that to make covariant subtyping > you need to use fixpoints, which is fine for a single > parameter but unworkable for a more complex term > structure. Forgive my ignorance, but what do you mean by this? Mike ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners