English version
Accueil     Ŕ propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis ŕ jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml ŕ l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2004-03-22 (06:46)
From: Sven Luther <sven.luther@w...>
Subject: Re: OCaml's Cathedral & Bazaar (was Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library)
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 04:11:23PM -0500, John Carr wrote:
> > So, how is that different participating in the Ocaml Consortium, and
> > thus making sure someone is paid to do the things you need ? Or is payng
> > for one thing ok, but not for the other ? 
> I read the OCaml Consortium contract and it is not a support
> contract as far as I can tell.  Does Inria have an obligation
> to fix bugs reported by members?

I believe the ocaml team will fix bug all the same, even if they have no
contract with you. That is the difference between a serious developer
team, and folk only there to milk money from you, like microsoft.


Sven Luther

To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners