Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Benjamin Geer <ben@s...>
Subject: Re: OCaml's Cathedral & Bazaar (was Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library)
Matt Gushee wrote:
>>High on my wish-list for the core ocaml system is
>>namespaces or something similiar to help resolve this problem.
> Agreed. Even in my fairly short time programming OCaml, I've had to
> struggle several times to find a good name for a module.

What I'd like is to be able to create a unique name for a project, and 
then use it as a namespace containing non-unique module names.  For 
example, I use the domain for my Caml work.  I'd like to 
be able to create a Saucecode namespace, and within it create module 
names representing libraries, without worrying about whether those names 
are unique in the whole Caml community.  So a user could use my 
Saucecode.Foo module, and someone else's Extlib.Foo module, without any 

Today I can create a Saucecode module with a Foo module inside it, but I 
can only define Saucecode once.  That means that I would have to package 
all my libraries as a single download, and anyone who wanted to use one 
library would have to use them all.


To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: