Browse thread
[Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library
-
Vasili Galchin
- james woodyatt
-
Richard Jones
-
Shawn Wagner
-
Eric Stokes
-
Vasili Galchin
-
Eric Stokes
-
Vasili Galchin
-
Matt Gushee
-
Richard Jones
-
Nicolas Cannasse
- Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
- Wolfgang Müller
-
John Carr
-
Richard Jones
-
oliver@f...
-
John Carr
-
Richard Jones
- Jacques Garrigue
- Benjamin Geer
- Michael Vanier
- Sven Luther
-
Richard Jones
- Sven Luther
-
John Carr
-
oliver@f...
-
Richard Jones
-
Nicolas Cannasse
- Shawn Wagner
- Vasili Galchin
- Vasili Galchin
-
Richard Jones
-
Matt Gushee
-
Vasili Galchin
-
Eric Stokes
-
Vasili Galchin
-
Eric Stokes
-
Shawn Wagner
- Stefano Zacchiroli
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Christophe TROESTLER <debian00@t...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Structuring the Caml community |
Hi, Here is my grain of salt about this issue. On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, oliver@first.in-berlin.de (Oliver Bandel) wrote: > > "The community" [...] is not orgenized enough to set up such a website. On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Richard Jones <rich@annexia.org> wrote: > > [...] except to say that my company would be prepared to fund a > [virtual] server and put a little time into developing this repository. On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Alex Baretta <alex@baretta.com> wrote: > > a central repository would be cool, and my company, too, would help > finance it or staff it. Interested people please go ahead! Why not have two (or more) machines that are mirror of each other? Also, one could reuse the Savanah software so as to provide development support, forums, documentation,... -- the list of available Caml packages could automatically be computed from the projects. Moreover dependencies with other project could conveniently be generated from META (or other) files and be rendered on-line as links. On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Markus Mottl <markus@oefai.at> wrote: > > Some kind of package management in the spirit of GODI would be very > nice indeed, and I think that this should also become part of the > "Cathedral", because it would otherwise not take off easily. > Package management is such a basic and important tool that really > everybody using OCaml would need. I agree with Markus here. Not only coming with the standard distribution would make it the de facto standard but, what is more important, INRIA developers probably know more than anybody else about the various portability issues. Indeed I am not sure how well GODI or findlib work on M$ Win32 for example. Also, one needs to cooperate with Debian (or Redhat,...) packagers -- they have some experience and it would be good that the package system integrates well with their efforts. Finally, there should exist some minimal Makefile or such so that when one library binds to C/Fortran/... code, it is "easy" to do cross platform compilation. Lots of us I believe only have access to few of the platforms that OCaml supports ; tools and guidelines would be very helpful. My 2¢, ChriS ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners