Benjamin Geer wrote:
> Eric Stokes wrote:
> 
>> (the index site, see #1)
>> http://www.ocaml.org/
>>
>> Actually is a very good index site, almost on par with perl's. Has all 
>> the relevant requirements,
> 
> 
> I think it's an embarrassment.  It's an unmaintained site that hasn't 
> updated since 2002.  
<snip>
> As you point out, 
> the news items haven't been updated since 2002, which strongly gives the 
> impression that Caml is completely dead.  

This is also especially bad for people like me who didn't know until 
recently that it's not the official site (but there's no mention on 
caml.inria.fr that it is).

Oh, and it's the first hit on Google for 'ocaml'.


Matt

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners