Browse thread
[Caml-list] extensible records again
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] extensible records again |
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 09:35, Michael Vanier wrote: > Is the code for Vyper still available? No, it was deleted from Sourceforge and I have no copy. > Also, is there really any significant speed difference between polymorphic > variants and regular variants? It is hard to say, but I would tend to ignore the performance issue, at least at first. For some types such as: 'a option where you have a match x with Some y -> ... | None inside a tight loop there may be a small difference. I haven't done any serious performance tests though. > How would this compare to using exceptions > as an extensible variant type? I thought exceptions were just a weak form of polymorhic variant. -- John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net voice: 061-2-9660-0850, snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners