Browse thread
[Caml-list] Delegation based OO
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Yamagata Yoriyuki <yoriyuki@m...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Delegation based OO |
From: Alex Baretta <alex@baretta.com> Subject: [Caml-list] Delegation based OO Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:18:05 +0100 > This is really a pain. I would expect delegation to be supported in the > coolest OO language under the sun ;) As far as I know, type theory for object-based OO is still on-going research topic. In your example, class *type* does_something = object ... end class does_more (an_object:#does_something) = object delegates an_object ... end "an_object" may have a method, say, "an_object#foo : int". "does_more" could overwrite the method, and define "does_more#foo : float". Now, what type should "self#pooh" have in the definition of an_object? But you know something I do not aware? ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners