On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 20:34, Jacques Garrigue wrote:
> From: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>

> The main reason I see for wanting dynamic loading of native code is
> speed, 

.. although the bytecode interpreter is apparently quite fast,
and for my purposes (a compiler) probably adequate (except for the
too small stack size). However I've found the native code more
robust, and since the bytecode and native code compilers use
*different* binding interfaces to C I felt I had to chose one or 
the other, and for better or worse I've gone with the native
code system. Felix actually works both ways at the moment ..
but there is no extensibility yet.

-- 
John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net
voice: 061-2-9660-0850, 
snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia
Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net



-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners