Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] [Q] explicit typing again
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Remi Vanicat <remi.vanicat@l...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [Q] explicit typing again
fis@wiwi.hu-berlin.de writes:

> hi,
>
> sorry, but i am really enthusiastic about explicit typing.  i will
> probably start to annotate expressions like "3" soon...  (-:
>
> could anybody tell me how i get this one straight?
>
> # let (a: int, b) = (1, 3) in a;;

it is  :

let ((a:int),b) = (1, 3) in a;;

> # let (a, b) : int * int = (1, 3) in a;;

there it is :
let ((a, b) : int * int) = (1, 3) in a;;

In fact, often it is enough to add some parenthesis around the
"value : type" to make the parser happy.



-- 
Rémi Vanicat

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners