Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2004-03-21 (21:11)
From: John Carr <jfc@m...>
Subject: Re: OCaml's Cathedral & Bazaar (was Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library)

> So, how is that different participating in the Ocaml Consortium, and
> thus making sure someone is paid to do the things you need ? Or is payng
> for one thing ok, but not for the other ? 

I read the OCaml Consortium contract and it is not a support
contract as far as I can tell.  Does Inria have an obligation
to fix bugs reported by members?

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: