English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Different behaviour in native and bytecode compilations (Compiler Bug?)
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2004-03-03 (00:22)
From: nickgrey@s...
Subject: [Caml-list] Re: Different behaviour in native and bytecode compilations (Compiler Bug?)
John Gerard Malecki writes: 

> I built your program "out of the box" and I get the exact behavior for
> all executables. 
>      X
>      X
>      X 
>      X
>      X
>      X 
> :; ocamlc.opt -version
> 3.07
> :; ocamlopt.opt -version
> 3.07 

Thanks John... your message prompted me to try another version.  I couldn't 
find a plain 3.07 (as it's been replaced by 3.07+2 on the website), but I 
downloaded and installed 3.06.  My demo program compiled with 3.06 this also 
displays the correct output.  (Correct as in the bug doesn't happen.)  So it 
seems that 3.06 and 3.07 work correctly, but 3.07+2 doesn't, for me at 

Perhaps someone on the list with 3.07+2 installed can compile my demo 
program and let me know what happens.  This will tell me if this is a bug 
introduced in 3.07+2 (or 3.07+1) or if it's a bug that just affects me.  
(Maybe I broke my O'Caml install somehow, although I don't really see how.) 


To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners