Browse thread
[Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library
-
Vasili Galchin
- james woodyatt
-
Richard Jones
-
Shawn Wagner
-
Eric Stokes
-
Vasili Galchin
-
Eric Stokes
-
Vasili Galchin
-
Matt Gushee
-
Richard Jones
-
Nicolas Cannasse
- Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
- Wolfgang Müller
-
John Carr
-
Richard Jones
-
oliver@f...
-
John Carr
-
Richard Jones
- Jacques Garrigue
- Benjamin Geer
- Michael Vanier
- Sven Luther
-
Richard Jones
- Sven Luther
-
John Carr
-
oliver@f...
-
Richard Jones
-
Nicolas Cannasse
- Shawn Wagner
- Vasili Galchin
- Vasili Galchin
-
Richard Jones
-
Matt Gushee
-
Vasili Galchin
-
Eric Stokes
-
Vasili Galchin
-
Eric Stokes
-
Shawn Wagner
- Stefano Zacchiroli
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Shawn Wagner <shawnw@s...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library |
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 05:55:27PM +0000, Richard Jones wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 09:30:09AM -0800, Vasili Galchin wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have yet to finish reading through otherlibs/unix/unix.mli. I kind of consider this POSIX API support. In any case, is there is a consensus that what is in unix.mli is complete? Or does new functionality have to be added? If so, what? > > No way!! There's lots of missing stuff which could be added. eg. off > the top of my head, strftime(3). <Plug> Some missing functions from the C and POSIX standards are in my extlib library (strftime is Time.format_time). http://raevnos.pennmush.org/code/extlib/ More (The numeric ones added in C99) are in the companion mathlib. http://raevnos.pennmush.org/code/mathlib/ </Plug> > > It would also be useful to have a comprehensive time / date library, > probably outside the Unix module. As part of the perl4caml project > I've wrapped up Perl's Date::Parse, Date::Format and Date::Calc[1] > modules, but a general OCaml library would be great. Agreed. -- Shawn Wagner shawnw@speakeasy.org ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners