Browse thread
[Caml-list] [ANNOUNCE] Development versions: ocamlconf, ASPCC
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Issac Trotts <ijtrotts@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] [ANNOUNCE] Development versions: ocamlconf, ASPCC |
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 08:56:27PM +0100, David MENTRE wrote: > Hello Kenneth, > > Kenneth Knowles <kknowles@uclink.berkeley.edu> writes: > > > The configure script (actually configure.mlc, for technical reasons, > > and the configure script is a shell wrapper around `ocaml configure.mlc`) is > > also plain text ocaml, but with additional code copied into it. > > So the produced configure script is an OCaml program that needs the > ocaml environment to run? I share all the objections against autoconf, > but at least it produces a simple sh script that can run on any (unix) > system. The role of a configure script is also to find the ocaml > compiler or warn that it is a requirement. That's said, I admit that if > somebody intends to compile an OCaml program, he probably have ocaml on > his machine. But that's still introduce a dependency *before* running > the configure script of which role is to find dependencies. We could solve this problem by bundling a simple sh script to check whether OCaml is installed, and maybe get it if not. -- Issac Trotts http://redwood.ucdavis.edu/~issac ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners