On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 16:56, skaller wrote:
>On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 15:58, Max Powers wrote:
>
> > So as I see it I've got the following options:
> > 1) write the parser in ocaml. Wrap ocaml in C then wrap that using SWIG 
>into
> > a python module.
> > 2) write the parser in C. Use SWIG to generate Ocaml and python modules.
> > 3) write the parser in python. Use Pycaml to call the python module from
> > Ocaml.
>
>Ocaml is well suited to parsing and analysing
>the parsed terms. If you head for (2) or (3) one needs
>to ask why bother using Ocaml at all?

Ah, that's 'cause I've got a huge application written (by others, I'm just 
the GUI bunny) in Ocaml. They're not real happy with the current parser 
(it's kind of crufty I believe), so would be happy to replace it, so long as 
the data is available in the Ocaml world. Parsing config files isn't the 
apps main job :).

-Max

_________________________________________________________________
Personalise your phone with chart ringtones and polyphonics. Go to  
http://ringtones.com.au/ninemsn/control?page=/ninemsn/main.jsp

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners