Browse thread
Re: OCaml's Cathedral & Bazaar (was Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library)
-
John Carr
-
Richard Jones
- Jacques Garrigue
- Benjamin Geer
- Michael Vanier
- Sven Luther
-
Richard Jones
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: OCaml's Cathedral & Bazaar (was Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library) |
On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 14:20, Vasili Galchin wrote: > Bottom line: there are a lot of > valuable contributions to OCaml that should be code > reviewed and if good checked-in! Alternative: C++, > i.e. sh*t! C++ has a formal ISO review process plus a community based development site (Boost), and other media (eg USENET). The code is free for any use, the specifications are not but they're cheap (thanks mainly to the USA national standards body). Caml has a different development model, and one can imagine a reluctance to move it closer to the C++ model for fear the result might be similar .. -- John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net voice: 061-2-9660-0850, snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners