English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2004-04-16 (01:19)
From: Kenneth Knowles <kknowles@b...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: GODI vs. Ocamake
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 04:58:47PM -0700, Brandon J. Van Every wrote:
> Productive would be, you go do your thing, we'll go do ours.  Enough
> talk.  We know where our lines of disagreement are.

Actually I don't know at all.  All I know at this point is that we agree that
current tools are inadequate (many times over).  If we "go our separate ways"
it'd be stopping the discussion before it starts, and each party certainly has a
right to do that, it's just a bummer.


To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners