Browse thread
[Caml-list] [ANN] The Missing Library
-
John Goerzen
-
Kenneth Knowles
- Alexander V. Voinov
-
John Goerzen
-
Maxence Guesdon
-
John Goerzen
-
Maxence Guesdon
-
Maxence Guesdon
- Nicolas Cannasse
-
John Goerzen
-
Maxence Guesdon
- Matthieu BRUCHER
-
Maxence Guesdon
- John Goerzen
-
Maxence Guesdon
-
John Goerzen
-
Alain.Frisch@e...
-
John Goerzen
-
Alain.Frisch@e...
-
Nicolas Cannasse
-
Yamagata Yoriyuki
- Gerd Stolpmann
-
Nicolas Cannasse
-
Yamagata Yoriyuki
- Jacques GARRIGUE
- Nicolas Cannasse
-
Yamagata Yoriyuki
-
Yamagata Yoriyuki
-
Nicolas Cannasse
- oliver@f...
-
Alain.Frisch@e...
-
John Goerzen
- Henri DF
- Shawn Wagner
- james woodyatt
-
Alain.Frisch@e...
- Basile STARYNKEVITCH
-
Maxence Guesdon
-
John Goerzen
- Kenneth Knowles
- Florian Hars
-
Maxence Guesdon
- Eric C. Cooper
-
Kenneth Knowles
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-04-24 (08:12) |
From: | Matthieu BRUCHER <matthieu.brucher@w...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] The Missing Library |
Maxence Guesdon wrote: >Dans son style inimitable, John Goerzen écrivait: > > > >>>Sorry, the real start of the whole discussion is here: >>>http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200403/msg00091.html >>> >>> >>Got it. We seem to be e-mailing past each other a bit here. >> >>Anyway, I've been reading that thread and haven't really seen anyone >>defending the standard library yet. I found this message particularly >>compelling: >> >>http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200403/msg00166.html >> >>And Xavier's reply: >> >>http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200403/msg00171.html >> >>Which, if I may boil several pages down into a few characters, seems to >>say "We know it sucks, but don't have time to fix it quickly." That >>does not translate, in my mind, to "your complaints are invalid", which >>is what you seem to be saying. So I still don't understand where you're >>coming from. >> >> > >I'm not saying "your complaints are invalid", i'm just (personnally) >tired of always reading the same discussions again and again. > > > >>All of which, though, is somewhat beside the point. How are we going to >>*fix* it? >> >> > >Why not start by merging your lib with Extlib ? > >- m > > I'm not a well-known or simply good programmer, just my few cents, but if the library is that buggy, it is perhaps more useful to refactor some part of it ? -- Matthieu BRUCHER Etudiant en 3ème année à SUPELEC Option Information, Signaux, Mesures ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners