C++ has many more problems than that, e.g. gluing OO
on a legacy languages, pointers, etc. Even without
bloat it would be a terrible language. I am in no way
suggesting making OCaml into some bloatware.

Vasili

--- Kip Macy <kmacy@fsmware.com> wrote:
> Widespread adoptance of C++ pre-dates the ISO
> committee's bloating of
> the language.
> 
> 					-Kip
> 
> On Tue, 6 Apr 2004, Benjamin Geer wrote:
> 
> > skaller wrote:
> > > Caml has a different development model, and one
> can
> > > imagine a reluctance to move it closer to the
> C++
> > > model for fear the result might be similar ..
> >
> > Do you mean wide use of the language in industry?
> :)
> >
> > Ben
> >
> > -------------------
> > To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
> FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
> > Beginner's list:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> >
> 
> -------------------
> To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ:
> http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
> Beginner's list:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners