On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 04:11:25PM +0100, Jon Harrop wrote:
> 
> On Thursday 08 April 2004 3:53 pm, John Goerzen wrote:
> > I'm just saying that I think that
> > "Ocaml has a robust set of tools for real-world uses" is inaccurate.
> 
> Yes, I agree. Personally, I would like to see a carefully thought out 
> interface to OpenGL, GLU etc. They are very stable and mature libraries which 
> were superbly thought out but, unfortunately, suffer from a low-level API 
> which sometimes ends up in a lot of "void *" raw data getting passed around 
> and kept. I do not know of an existing, elegant interface to these libraries 
> in any functional language and, IMHO, it would be a big but very worthwhile 
> undertaking to create such an interface. I think this would make a good PhD 
> for someone...

Did you look at LablGL?

-- 
Issac Trotts
http://mallorn.ucdavis.edu/~ijtrotts
(w) 530-757-8789

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners