Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Re: OCaml's Cathedral & Bazaar (was Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library)
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@p...>
Subject: Re: OCaml's Cathedral & Bazaar (was Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library)
skaller wrote:
> 
> On the other hand accepted principles are valid arguments, 
> for example functions operating on a container type shall take
> the container as the first argument.

Ah, here controversy already starts. AFAICS, this is neither an accepted 
nor a good principle in a language with currying. For example, there is 
good practical reason that map, fold, etc take the container as their 
last argument. ;-)

Cheers,

     - Andreas

-- 
Andreas Rossberg, rossberg@ps.uni-sb.de

Let's get rid of those possible thingies!  -- TB

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners