Browse thread
Re: OCaml's Cathedral & Bazaar (was Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library)
-
John Carr
-
Richard Jones
- Jacques Garrigue
- Benjamin Geer
- Michael Vanier
- Sven Luther
-
Richard Jones
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@p...> |
| Subject: | Re: OCaml's Cathedral & Bazaar (was Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library) |
skaller wrote:
>
> On the other hand accepted principles are valid arguments,
> for example functions operating on a container type shall take
> the container as the first argument.
Ah, here controversy already starts. AFAICS, this is neither an accepted
nor a good principle in a language with currying. For example, there is
good practical reason that map, fold, etc take the container as their
last argument. ;-)
Cheers,
- Andreas
--
Andreas Rossberg, rossberg@ps.uni-sb.de
Let's get rid of those possible thingies! -- TB
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners