Browse thread
[Caml-list] failwith, raise and type inference
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Eric C. Cooper <ecc@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] failwith, raise and type inference |
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 05:05:44PM +1000, skaller wrote:
> I'm not sure there *are* any 'usual' rules in maths.
Yes, traditional math notation needs human disambiguation:
consider sin^2 (x) versus sin^{-1} (x)
I don't think we want to require AI in the ocaml parser ...
--
Eric C. Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners