Browse thread
[Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code
-
John Goerzen
- Vitaly Lugovsky
- Samuel Mimram
-
Basile Starynkevitch
-
Issac Trotts
- Dustin Sallings
-
Brian Hurt
- Oleg Trott
- Ville-Pertti Keinonen
-
John Goerzen
-
Markus Mottl
-
Richard Jones
-
Markus Mottl
- Jon Harrop
-
John Goerzen
- Jean-Marc EBER
-
Trevor Andrade
-
Gerd Stolpmann
- skaller
-
John Goerzen
-
Gerd Stolpmann
-
Christophe TROESTLER
-
Gerd Stolpmann
-
Christophe TROESTLER
- Brandon J. Van Every
- John Goerzen
- Jacques GARRIGUE
-
Christophe TROESTLER
-
Gerd Stolpmann
-
Christophe TROESTLER
- Matt Gushee
-
Gerd Stolpmann
- Benjamin Geer
-
Gerd Stolpmann
- skaller
-
Markus Mottl
- John Goerzen
- Jon Harrop
-
Richard Jones
- Fernando Alegre
- Jean-Marc EBER
- Kenneth Knowles
- Brian Hurt
- skaller
-
Markus Mottl
- Issac Trotts
- Basile Starynkevitch
-
Issac Trotts
- clement capel
- Jon Harrop
- Walid Taha
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | John Goerzen <jgoerzen@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code |
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 01:17:01PM +0200, Gerd Stolpmann wrote: > You should have a look at GODI, http://www.ocaml-programming.de/godi, > which is a caml distribution (although not very complete yet). However, > GODI does not implement the "one big download" approach, but allows the > user to select the packages he wants. The big advantage is that > independent updates are possible. There is no disadvantage for the user > because there is a nice user interface that hides the complex technical > details. Hi Gerd, I've seen several references here to GODI and I checked it out. I am wearing several "hats" in this discussion; one of them is a developer for Debian, and another is a developer, and another still is an end-user of OCaml code. >From the surface (and this is just from reading, not from actually installing it), one problem I see with GODI is that it will not necessarily play nice with an existing packaging system. For instance, if the user has installed OCaml and some libraries from Debian already, but wants to add some others from GODI, it looks problematic. Perl's CPAN addresses this nicely (it will simply download things not already present and install them in a separate directory). Also, moving everything into ocamlfind may cause compatibility issues for application developers that may be accustomed to not using ocamlfind for certain libraries that are not normally distributed using ocamlfind. Having said all that, I think that GODI is an excellent idea and sorely needed. I still maintain that installation of libraries and applications in OCaml is way more difficult than it need be. -- John ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners