English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2004-04-15 (16:01)
From: Kenneth Knowles <kknowles@b...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: GODI vs. Ocamake
On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 05:33:38PM +1000, skaller wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 16:34, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 11:05:12AM +1000, skaller wrote:
> > I never said they were perfect.  I don't use them.  However, I don't know of
> > anything other than a custom-rolled Makefile that handles such things.  Are you
> > suggesting one?  If so, I'm very interested, and I may have missed it in your
> > previous messages.
> I'm suggesting a whole class of them: general purpose languages.
> Here's a fragment from the Felix build script.
> Who needs autoconf?
> [script]

Do you see how you are doing the same work as autoconf, but in a language other
than m4/shell?  Moreover almost all of that should be provided by the build tool,
not written by the programmer.  A reasonable size of build script to locate the
ocaml tools and set a couple flags is under a dozen lines.


To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners