On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 01:54:51PM -0700, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 03:23:42PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > But the fact that these libraries exist is, at its heart, a symptom of
> > the problems with the OCaml standard library.
> 
> I'm just encouraging the dissenters to cooperate to more thoroughly demonstrate
> their case, and get a well-design library.
> 
> I do suggest splitting domain-independent stuff like extended list and hashtable
> functions from specialized stuff like IMAP and config file parsers.

That does make some sense; the former could possibly go into Extlib
without much difficulty.  They also represent less new work, so I'd have
less of a complaint about my work ending up under the LGPL instead of
the GPL.

I'll talk to them about it.

-- John

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners