Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2004-04-10 (10:10)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: OT: licences (was Re: [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code)
On Fri, 2004-04-09 at 18:35, Benjamin Geer wrote:
> skaller wrote:
> > Ocaml itself isn't a problem: the intent is clear,
> > the distro is to be trusted (I won't modify it even
> > if I do find a bug), and there is always an option
> > of a commercial licence.
> There's no harm in asking third-party library authors if they'll sell 
> you a commercial licence, too.  

.. and no point. I don't have any money to buy one.

Worse, the product may itself need other 3PL.
For example: PCRE depends on pcre. Markkus might
sell a licence for PCRE but its useless without
pcre, and he can't sell me a licence for that.

The problem is scale. I have no problem with Ocaml
because a really large client who wanted my system
could indeed negotiate with INRIA if needed.

But I can't expect them to trade with Markkus,
its bad enough that they're dealing with me :)

John Skaller,
voice: 061-2-9660-0850, 
snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia
Checkout the Felix programming language

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: