Browse thread
[oliver: Re: [oliver: Re: [Caml-list] Should be INSIDE STANDARD-LIB: Hashtbl.keys]]
- oliver@f...
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-04-24 (09:20) |
From: | oliver@f... |
Subject: | [oliver: Re: [oliver: Re: [Caml-list] Should be INSIDE STANDARD-LIB: Hashtbl.keys]] |
----- Forwarded message from oliver ----- To: Martin Jambon <martin_jambon@emailuser.net> Subject: Re: [oliver: Re: [Caml-list] Should be INSIDE STANDARD-LIB: Hashtbl.keys] On Sat, Apr 24, 2004 at 03:30:53PM +0800, Martin Jambon wrote: > On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Oliver Bandel wrote: > > > When you want to report each key only once, you need a temporarily > > hash to sort out multiple stuff. This, because the fold-function > > reports EACH binding (and it good that it does it), and therefore > > multiple bindings to a key will occur more than once. > > The function has to sort them out. > > > > I'm shure it's more efficient to implement that inside the > > hashtbl-module. (I've not looked into the sources, but suppose > > that it will be more performant, when a Hashtbl.keys will > > be implemented inside the Hashtbl-module.) > > Please, tell me why you don't like my solution: > http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200404/msg00527.html I have not read it until now. But will have a look at it immediately. Ciao, Oliver ----- End forwarded message ----- ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners