Browse thread
[Caml-list] Fwd: Polymorphic optional label argument, with default
-
Richard Jones
- Gerd Stolpmann
- Matt Gushee
-
Brian Hurt
-
Richard Jones
- skaller
-
Jacques Garrigue
-
nadji
- Jacques Garrigue
-
nadji
-
Richard Jones
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@k...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Fwd: Polymorphic optional label argument, with default |
From: nadji <nadji@noos.fr>
> Le Sunday 11 April 2004 15:16, Jacques Garrigue a ecrit :
> > Basically, what you are asking for is a new type of constraint, which
> > is only to be applied when the optional argument is omitted (and as
> > result the default is selected).
> > This is not possible in the current type system, and while there are
> > some uses for that, it would be hard to justify making types more
> > complex in the general case, just to handle this specific problem.
> I would like to point out that a machinery to handle this problem
> is guarded recursive datatypes proposed by Xi. It is a framework
> that solves a bunch of other problems and is compatible with ml type
> system (there is currently at Inria a student working on an Ocaml integration
> of this type system).
> Combining it with your labeled parameters leads to a well typed code
> analogous to your phantom-type based solution. Some even view
> Xi's GRDT as a way to avoid your Obj.magic when matching against
> a phantom type.
> For those interested, the pseudo code would be something like :
>
> guarded 'a opt = Omit with 'a = int | Arg of 'a->unit
> let plot : ?(labels:'a opt) -> 'a graph -> unit =
> fun ?(labels=Omit) g ->
> let printing_labels : 'a -> unit =
> match labels with
> Omit -> print_int
> | Arg x -> x
> in
> ... printing_labels node_label ...
I was not aware that there was already work to include guarded types
in ocaml. They are indeed a nice solution to this problem,
particularly as they allow to cleanly separate issues.
Another (less clean) way to do that is with dependant
polymorphic variants, as implemented in a branch of the ocaml CVS:
# let incr ~f x =
let x = x+1 in
multimatch f with `None -> x | `Some f -> f x
;;
val incr :
f:[< `None & 'a = int | `Some of int -> 'b & 'a = 'b ] -> int -> 'a = <fun>
# incr ~f:`None 3;;
- : int = 4
# incr ~f:(`Some string_of_int) 3;;
- : string = "4"
(Note that for this to really work, optional arguments would have to
use polymorphic variants, which is why it is not as clean as guarded
types.)
Jacques Garrigue
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners