Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] [ANN] The Missing Library
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] The Missing Library
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 00:02, Nicolas Cannasse wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 22:36, Nicolas Cannasse wrote:

> Such comparison  tail = end , is also well fitted for the C++ world, where
> in general NULL is the end of everything, and operator overloading helps
> here a lot. Just one question : what is the excepted behavior of equality
> between two iterators coming from two different data structures 

They have distinct types so: compile time error.
[I assume you mean for example a list and an array]

>  What about equality between two
> iterators over two different dynamic arrays ? 

I think from memory, equality must work. 
However, less (<) operator is undefined.

> Please state clearly your problems on the ExtLib mailling list, I will be
> happy to think about theses :)

I already did quite extensively.. :)

John Skaller,
voice: 061-2-9660-0850, 
snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia
Checkout the Felix programming language

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: