English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2004-04-15 (01:05)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: GODI vs. Ocamake
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 02:49, Kenneth Knowles wrote:

> Just so I don't leave anyone out, I'd say both ocamake and OCamlMakefile handle
> (1) and (3) all at once.

Yeah? How would they handle Interscript sources?
What about Camlp4?

My system also contains *Felix* programs,
since it happens to be a compiler. How do these
make systems handle that?

What about my use of SWIG to generate wrappers?
That's another 'programming language' which needs
to know about what libraries are installed on your target

By far the best way to handle this complexity is with
a SINGLE general purpose language.

I chose Python because it runs on more platforms
than make, autoconf, or just about any other weird tool.
[C itself would have been more universal .. but a too hard
to write]

John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net
voice: 061-2-9660-0850, 
snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia
Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net

To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners