Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Re: OCaml's Cathedral & Bazaar (was Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library)
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: OCaml's Cathedral & Bazaar (was Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library)
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 09:03, Vasili Galchin wrote:
> John,
>    You misunderstood my point.

No I didn't :) YOu said at one point 

"I'm an old man and I'd love to see a 
decent language in the mainstream"

.. or words to that effect. Me too, both

The issue here is how to get the result we want.
I'd go for Ocaml 4 with the existing Ocaml team
remaining in full control of the compiler,
but relinquishing *totally* the standard library
to a public process.

The new library starts off EMPTY, and compatility
isn't allowed as an argument except as a tie breaker.

On the other hand accepted principles are valid arguments, 
for example functions operating on a container type shall take
the container as the first argument.

There's no way this process would work without
the Ocaml team being an active part of it!

[And I'm going to vote for Ocamlgraph being included
first thing!]

John Skaller,
voice: 061-2-9660-0850, 
snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia
Checkout the Felix programming language

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: