Browse thread
[Caml-list] failwith, raise and type inference
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Pierre Weis <pierre.weis@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] failwith, raise and type inference |
[...] > Admitedly caml syntax is not very beginner friendly. > But the observed parsing has some internal logics. > > On usualy understand that f x + y is in fact (f x) + y > But here, with failwith being a ``special'' function and ^ a ``special'' > operator, well... That could be part of the problem: failwith is not ``special'' nor is ^, hence the regular treatment of f x ^ y as (f x) ^ y and failwith x ^ y as (failwith x) ^ y. Operator precedence in Caml has been carefully crafted, you should have a look at the programming guide lines that gives some hints on the internal logics of some parts of the parsing, in the section When to use parentheses within an expression Best regards, Pierre Weis INRIA, Projet Cristal, Pierre.Weis@inria.fr, http://pauillac.inria.fr/~weis/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners