Browse thread
Re: OCaml's Cathedral & Bazaar (was Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library)
-
John Carr
-
Richard Jones
- Jacques Garrigue
- Benjamin Geer
- Michael Vanier
- Sven Luther
-
Richard Jones
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@k...> |
| Subject: | Re: OCaml's Cathedral & Bazaar (was Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library) |
From: Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@ps.uni-sb.de> > >> there is good practical reason that map, fold, etc take the > >> container as their last argument. ;-) > > > > Except that the folds in Hashtbl, Map.S and Set.S have the container in > > the second position (as does List.fold_right). > > Which I consider a design error indeed. :-) open MoreLabels (Sorry, but sometimes I want to remind people that parameter order is not really relevant) To be precise with labels you have: * the container is the first unlabelled argument * it can be in the last position simultaneously Jacques Garrigue ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners