Browse thread
[Caml-list] suggestion: do not link to www.ocaml.org
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Kenneth Knowles <kknowles@b...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] suggestion: do not link to www.ocaml.org |
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 09:08:41AM +0200, Michal Moskal wrote: > On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 11:32:14PM -0700, Kenneth Knowles wrote: > > C#? I do like it better than Java, and I'm sure it will spread, but anything > > without first-class functions (delegates are close, but syntactic abominations - > > anonymous inner classes are even more awful) and parametric polymorphism is like > > working in the stone age - its not like ML is new. > > <marketing mode on> http://nemerle.org anyone? ;-) </> Cool. I forgot to mention type inference, which is mandatory. I'm such a nitpicker that the if/when/unless nonorthogonality already bugs me. I like the dropping of the "new" keyword. On the .Net platform, SML.Net seems out of date, and F# seems relegated to the role of research project, so I may actually refer my .Net buddies to this. Another issue with F# is lack of integration into the visual studio; how does nemerle stack up with regard to using a "typical" windows toolchain? What about use with ASP.Net? I don't really know how the backend of the ASP.Net build process works, but if I could use Nemerle without having to convince anyone in my office (in the files I have sole dominion over) that would be great. Kenn ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners