Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Richard Jones <rich@a...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] build tools - good vs. fast, both cheap
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 04:10:25AM +1000, skaller wrote:
> I'm against make. It just isn't necessary. Make is for C developers,
> not Ocaml package installation. To build a package it suffices
> to run a sequence of commands in a fixed order.

Controversial view.  Why ..?  GNU make in particular is a very useful
tool for its specialised niche.  I use it all the time to build all
lots of things (not just C or OCaml).


Richard Jones.
Merjis Ltd. - improving website return on investment
MAKE+ is a sane replacement for GNU autoconf/automake. One script compiles,
RPMs, pkgs etc. Linux, BSD, Solaris.

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: