Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2004-04-15 (09:47)
From: Markus Mottl <markus@o...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: GODI vs. Ocamake
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, skaller wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 02:49, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> > Just so I don't leave anyone out, I'd say both ocamake and OCamlMakefile handle
> > (1) and (3) all at once.
> Yeah? How would they handle Interscript sources?
> What about Camlp4?

No problem, OCamlMakefile handles them by letting the user specify a
preprocessor in a comment in the first line.  See camlp4-example in
the distribution.

> My system also contains *Felix* programs,
> since it happens to be a compiler. How do these
> make systems handle that?

Add new "make"-rules?

> What about my use of SWIG to generate wrappers?

Look at the way "camlidl" is supported by OCamlMakefile and just add
this feature.


Markus Mottl

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: