On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 04:24, skaller wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-04-28 at 14:31, Brian Hurt wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Martin Berger wrote:
> 
> > I'm wondering what concepts Ocaml can't express/enforce? 
> 
> Iterators. 

Why can't you do this kind of in ocaml?  Returning something like a
"next" function would seem to give you a very basic (but usable)
iterator.  Which part of the iterator abstraction can't you do?

y

-- 
|--------/            Yaron M. Minsky              \--------|
|--------\ http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/yminsky/ /--------|

Open PGP --- KeyID B1FFD916
Fingerprint: 5BF6 83E1 0CE3 1043 95D8 F8D5 9F12 B3A9 B1FF D916


-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners