Browse thread
[Caml-list] suggestion: do not link to www.ocaml.org
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | John Goerzen <jgoerzen@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] suggestion: do not link to www.ocaml.org |
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 11:16:02AM -0700, Brandon J. Van Every wrote: > John Goerzen wrote: > > > To you. And I submit, you are a techie who thinks the word > > > 'hacker' has > > > positive connotations. Suits don't see it that way. Not that I'm a > > > > Sure, but -- who gives a damn? > > Clearly not you. Since you're not interested in entertaining the > perspective of target demographics other than your own, I don't see a > reason to belabor explaining anything to you. You won't listen. Nope, that's not what I'm saying. What I am saying is that you are poking at OCaml.org, complaining that it doesn't target suits. Well, it doesn't *try* to target suits; it's targeting techies, so I don't see the problem. I think it's fine to also target suits, but if a single site tries to reach everyone, it will wind up doing a poor job for any one particular interest. > > The site is clearly aimed at programmers who will understand. > > If one wants to grow a language base, why should it be so narrowly > aimed? I don't think there's a real problem with aiming at the people that will actually use it. Granted, hackers only make up part of the OCaml community; they may in fact be a minority compared to the scientists and mathematicians using OCaml. But I would suspect those audiences also can find something of value on ocaml.org. The point about the news freshness is indeed quite important; nobody wants to use a language that is dying. > > > Sure. A 2% market share can't be wrong. ;-) Beats OCaml by a mile > > > though. > > > > You have no idea what the Python "market share" is, > > One point of data: > http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm > There are others. You can Google for them yourself. If you actually > want to know, it's knowable. The ballpark is certainly correct: try > going to Monster.com and searching for Python jobs. ;-) Now try OCaml. > ;-) ;-) Well, we're verging on being off-topic here, but yes, I know Python is more popular than OCaml. Neither the tiobe.com nor search engines produces a very reliable number, though; a valid survey would likely be required to do that. -- John ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners