Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] [ANN] The Missing Library
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: brogoff@s...
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] The Missing Library
On Mon, 3 May 2004, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:
> OCaml doesn't have Haskell-like type classes, polymorphic recursion nor

I think OCaml does support polymorphic recursion, in at least two nonideal
ways, first through explicit polymorphism of record fields/polymorphic
methods  and secondly through recursive modules. You disagree?

Other than that, I mostly agree (OK, I'd prefer a better solution than
implicit stack resizing, like holes or promises, or whatever, for non tail
rec list functions), but I'm not ready to ditch OCaml for a dynamically typed

-- Brian

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: