Browse thread
[Caml-list] Total application of function with labels
-
Manos Renieris
- Evan Martin
- Jacques Garrigue
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-05-05 (23:16) |
From: | Evan Martin <martine@d...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Total application of function with labels |
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 05:18:22PM -0400, Manos Renieris wrote: > Is there a programming convention that would "enforce" labeling the > arguments in a total application of a certain function? # type withlabels = WithLabels;; type withlabels = WithLabels # let withlabels = WithLabels;; val withlabels : withlabels = WithLabels # let f ~a ~b ?(withlabels : withlabels option) = a + b;; Warning: This optional argument cannot be erased val f : a:int -> b:int -> ?withlabels:withlabels -> int = <fun> # f 2 3 ~withlabels;; Expecting function has type a:int -> b:int -> int This argument cannot be applied without label This includes the ... includes the "optional argument cannot be erased warning", which can be avoided at the cost of making the code even weirder. http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200211/msg00176.html discusses this a bit, but I'm not quite sure I understand it. :\ -- Evan Martin martine@danga.com http://neugierig.org ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners