Browse thread
[Caml-list] Ocamlyacc reentrancy
-
skaller
-
Jon Harrop
-
skaller
- Eckart Goehler
- Keith Wansbrough
-
skaller
-
Jon Harrop
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Keith Wansbrough <Keith.Wansbrough@c...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Ocamlyacc reentrancy |
> On Sat, 2004-05-01 at 14:47, Jon Harrop wrote: > > Apparently the Parser module should be reentrant because it is careful to save > > and load its global data. > > > > http://pauillac.inria.fr/caml/caml-list/0258.html > > Thanks for that link. Xavier says: > > "The module Parsing is supposed to be reentrant. Yes, there's some > global state inside, but we're careful to save and restore it across > entries. If you have a program demonstrating non-reentrance, please > send it to me privately and I'll try to fix that." What about multithreaded code? We wrote a couple of scripts that hack the output of ocamllex and ocamlyacc, and a slightly modified lexing.ml and parsing.ml, that give you purely functional lexers and parsers. The modification is trivial - just pass the state around in an argument, rather than a global variable. Let me know if you are interested. I think we got some positive noises from INRIA, but I'll leave it to them to comment re future OCaml releases. We didn't consider performance impact. --KW 8-) ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners