Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
[Caml-list] lstat on windows native
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] lstat on windows native
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 18:55, Olivier Andrieu wrote:

> No, using unimplemented features of the Unix module will never prevent
> your program to compile nor link. 

> The module signature is the same on
> all platforms. However, it will probably raise an exception at runtime
> (like Invalid_argument "foo not implemented").

Ah, ok .. that isn't what the documentation seems to imply
by saying 'not implemented'. If you are correct,
it *is* implemented, just having quite different
semantics.

-- 
John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net
voice: 061-2-9660-0850, 
snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia
Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net



-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners