Browse thread
[Caml-list] lstat on windows native
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-05-25 (09:41) |
From: | skaller <skaller@u...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] lstat on windows native |
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 18:55, Olivier Andrieu wrote: > No, using unimplemented features of the Unix module will never prevent > your program to compile nor link. > The module signature is the same on > all platforms. However, it will probably raise an exception at runtime > (like Invalid_argument "foo not implemented"). Ah, ok .. that isn't what the documentation seems to imply by saying 'not implemented'. If you are correct, it *is* implemented, just having quite different semantics. -- John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net voice: 061-2-9660-0850, snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners