Browse thread
[Caml-list] Best way to synchronize OS processes?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2004-05-12 (16:36) |
From: | Ranjan Bagchi <ranjan.bagchi@f...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Best way to synchronize OS processes? |
Incidentally -- I found my problem -- basic Unix system programming, I needed to seek back to the start of the area before attempting to unlock it. D'oh! Ranjan Ranjan Bagchi wrote: > Cool - I was playing with that call today, although I'm getting > occasional EDEADLK exceptions thrown though. Is there an example of > correct use? > What I'm doing (code isn't handy right now) is before writing to the > file, I get a write lock, write my bit, and then unlock the region. > Reading bits try to get a Read lock, and then unlock when they're done. > > I'm using | in_channel_of_descr| and out_channel_of_descr to do the > i/o -- is this a problem? > > Ranjan > > > Shawn Wagner wrote: > >> On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 11:05:23AM -0700, Ranjan Bagchi wrote: >> >> >>> Hi -- >>> >>> I'm writing some code which will end up executing concurrently on >>> several OS processes. I'd like to serialize access to some specific >>> OS resources (for instance, writing to a single file). The Unix >>> module doesn't appear to offer anything like a critical section or >>> an OS mutex. Is there a preferred way to do this? >>> >> >> >> File locking with Unix.lockf? >> >> >> >> > > ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners