Browse thread
[Caml-list] Lazy vs closure
-
Vladimir N. Silyaev
- David Brown
-
skaller
- Kenneth Knowles
- Kenneth Knowles
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | 2004-05-19 (13:13) |
| From: | Kenneth Knowles <kknowles@b...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Lazy vs closure |
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 07:10:21PM +1000, skaller wrote: > Is there any difference semantically? Yes, since lazy values are not recomputed. # let l = lazy (print_string "hello");; val l : unit lazy_t = <lazy> # Lazy.force l;; hello- : unit = () # Lazy.force l;; - : unit = () Kenn ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners